Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvanus of the Seventy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination proposes the non-deletion action of merging, and no delete !votes are present. Per the merge !vote herein, a discussion of such can continue on an article talk page. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Silvanus of the Seventy

Silvanus of the Seventy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no need for this article. I prefer to merge it with the article: Silas Jerm729 (talk) 04:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• Merge with the Seventy article. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per WP:SK as the nomination proposes merger, not deletion. Andrew (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep per Andrew, as the nom is not recommending deletion. In any case, this is a notable saint who may or may not be the same person as Silas. -- 101.117.3.222 (talk) 10:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
• Keep - based on long-standing precedent, any real person mentioned in ancient texts is presumed to be notable; the fact that he was a bishop also makes him notable. Bearian (talk) 20:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.