Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon Praveen Kumar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Non-notable researcher; unreferenced. seicer | talk | contribs 20:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gideon Praveen Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is a resume of what this young researcher has written and accomplished. Virtually any graduate student or research assistant could write a similar biography about him or herself. I see no evidence of academic notability. Note that the author, Biomedicalcitizen (talk · contribs), has no edits outside this article. I will notify him shortly. Buki ben Yogli (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is an unreferenced resume that appears to be original research. --Pmedema (talk) 23:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable person, maybe self-promotion.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable and unreferenced. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for above mentioned reasons. --Deepak D'Souza 09:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.